HELP! Does this work?
Dec. 8th, 2008 11:16 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
EDIT: THANK YOU EVERYONE! I have now got a working mockup. Disregard request below...
Guinea pigs needed to test out a webpage layout in different browsers and operating systems!
Please to click on This Dummy Webpage and tell me if it looks right.
1. The ornamental frame should hug the page as you resize the window.
2. The text blocks shouldn't overlap each other or the graphics. (It's okay if the title block in white has some text chopped off the bottom.)
3. The graphics shouldn't take too long to load in. (I may program them to pre-load, but I've compressed them to fairly dainty file sizes.)
I'm still not quite proficient in CSS positioning, so after trying desperately to use CSS to replicate my ancient Medieval Scroll Trick done with tables, I committed the cardinal sin of mixing tables and CSS. But at least this one doesn't use frames, which are even more verboten. The old AuronLu Shrine does.
Guinea pigs needed to test out a webpage layout in different browsers and operating systems!
Please to click on This Dummy Webpage and tell me if it looks right.
1. The ornamental frame should hug the page as you resize the window.
2. The text blocks shouldn't overlap each other or the graphics. (It's okay if the title block in white has some text chopped off the bottom.)
3. The graphics shouldn't take too long to load in. (I may program them to pre-load, but I've compressed them to fairly dainty file sizes.)
I'm still not quite proficient in CSS positioning, so after trying desperately to use CSS to replicate my ancient Medieval Scroll Trick done with tables, I committed the cardinal sin of mixing tables and CSS. But at least this one doesn't use frames, which are even more verboten. The old AuronLu Shrine does.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 07:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 07:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 12:53 pm (UTC)- the tiny line of text links at the top (I assume they are links? "Aulu Community LJ .. Fanfiction .. Adult fanfic .. " that block of text). That bit of text overlaps the border on the pale spot of the page by a little bit.
- Right before the test starts in the window, there is a bit of a gap. Here, I'm taking a screencap for you because it's too hard to describe: http://pics.livejournal.com/first_seventhe/pic/000203tq
I am, apparently, in IE6.0. I don't know whether you want to cater this low -- it's a shit work computer. Obviously no one looks at fanfiction while at work, right? ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 05:08 pm (UTC)Well, someone might still use IE at home. *twitch*
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 05:24 pm (UTC)http://pics.livejournal.com/first_seventhe/pic/00021gh8
I am starting to think my computer is just asstastic. Dear world, this is why no one uses IE.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 05:31 pm (UTC)Do the links still work?
If they do I may just say "frak it".
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 05:46 pm (UTC)Seriously, though, I think most people in the world have upgraded to IE7 -- this IE doesn't even have TABS. Oh, workplace. Never change.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 05:32 pm (UTC)That's how it's supposed to look.
I've tried putting the navbar in various different places. That's not perfect, but it's good enough, if only IE wouldn't crap out.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 05:34 pm (UTC)The only thing I'm wondering about is why I have a horizontal scroll.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 05:36 pm (UTC)I moved the second half of the navbar to the left so that it won't get cut off if someone's got a narrower screen.
Oh, for actual training! Self-taught and trying to do too much is a dangerous combination.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 05:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 07:19 pm (UTC)HTML does backflips for me. CSS is where I hit my limit.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-09 07:41 pm (UTC)One of these days I'll really learn CSS.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 08:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-10 09:04 pm (UTC)Thank you! I should edit this entry - -I finally got something that worked around 5AM this morning (d'oh)